Structure

How We Develop and Organise

The Problem of Hierarchy

Having inequality in rights and power that are not based on merit can have harmful effects on individuals and society. (As generated by Gemini AI on 11 August 2024)

For individuals within the hierarchy:

Stress and Anxiety: Those lower in the hierarchy often experience stress and anxiety due to the perceived or actual power imbalance, fear of repercussions, and lack of control.
Reduced Self-Esteem: Feeling less valued or respected due to one’s position in the hierarchy can negatively impact self-esteem and confidence.
Limited Opportunities: Those at lower levels may have limited access to resources, decision-making power, and opportunities for growth and advancement.
Exploitation and Abuse: Power imbalances can create an environment where those in power can exploit or abuse those with less power, leading to harassment, discrimination, and even violence.
Decreased Motivation and Engagement: Feeling powerless and undervalued can lead to decreased motivation, reduced job satisfaction, and lower productivity.

For those in positions of power:

Loss of Empathy: Those in power may become less empathetic to the needs and perspectives of those lower in the hierarchy, leading to poor decision-making and a disconnect from reality.
Increased Stress and Responsibility: While power can bring benefits, it also comes with added stress and responsibility, which can impact mental and physical health.
Corruption and Abuse of Power: The temptation to misuse power for personal gain can lead to corruption and unethical behavior.

For society as a whole:

Inequality and Social Injustice: Power hierarchies can perpetuate systemic inequality, limiting opportunities for marginalized groups and creating social divides.
Reduced Innovation and Creativity: Strict hierarchies can stifle dissent and limit creative thinking, hindering innovation and progress.
Conflict and Social Unrest: When power is concentrated in the hands of a few, it can lead to social unrest, conflict, and even revolution.

There are, however, hierarchies that support well-being which typically exhibit the following characteristics:

Fairness and Meritocracy: Positions of authority are earned based on merit, competence, and demonstrated skills, rather than arbitrary factors like family ties or social connections. There is a clear and transparent system for advancement, with opportunities available to all individuals regardless of their background.
Clear Communication and Transparency: There is open and honest communication between all levels of the hierarchy, with clear expectations, feedback, and decision-making processes. Information flows freely throughout the organisation, and individuals have access to the information they need to perform their roles effectively.
Empowerment and Autonomy: Individuals at all levels are given a degree of autonomy and decision-making power within their roles, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility. Leaders empower their subordinates by providing them with the resources, support, and guidance needed to succeed.
Collaboration and Teamwork: Hierarchies that prioritize collaboration and teamwork create a sense of shared purpose and encourage individuals to work together towards common goals. This fosters a supportive and inclusive environment where everyone feels valued and respected.
Flexibility and Adaptability: Healthy hierarchies are flexible and adaptable, allowing for change and innovation in response to new challenges and opportunities. They encourage individuals to take initiative and think creatively, rather than rigidly adhering to established norms and procedures.
Focus on Growth and Development: There is a commitment to ongoing learning and development at all levels of the hierarchy, with opportunities for training, mentorship, and skill-building. This helps individuals reach their full potential and contributes to the overall success of the organization.
Compassion and Empathy: Leaders and individuals within the hierarchy demonstrate compassion and empathy towards others, creating a psychologically safe environment where everyone feels supported and valued. This fosters trust and promotes positive relationships, which are essential for wellbeing.

Examples of hierarchies that can support wellbeing:

Mentorship Programs: Where experienced individuals guide and support less experienced ones, fostering growth and development.
Flat Organizational Structures: Where there are fewer layers of management, empowering individuals and encouraging collaboration.
Self-Managed Teams: Where teams have autonomy over their work and decision-making, increasing engagement and ownership.
Organizations with Strong Values: Where there is a clear focus on ethical behavior, social responsibility, and employee well-being.

It’s important to note that no hierarchy is perfect, and even the most well-intentioned structures can have drawbacks. However, by prioritizing fairness, transparency, empowerment, collaboration, and compassion, hierarchies can create environments that support the wellbeing of all individuals involved.

Swarm Organisation: A starting point

Of the organising structures that have been researched, the swarm structure could support the values and purpose of the project and be used as a starting point and adapted as needed. The description below was generated by Gemini AI on 11 August 2024

Swarm Organisational Structure

The Swarm Organisational Structure is a decentralized, self-organising model inspired by the collective behaviour of natural swarms like bees or ants. In contrast to traditional hierarchical structures, it emphasises:

Decentralised Decision-Making: No single leader or manager holds ultimate authority. Decisions are made collectively based on the knowledge and expertise of individuals within the swarm.
Self-organisation: Individuals and teams autonomously organise their work based on a shared understanding of goals and priorities.
Adaptability and Agility: The swarm structure enables organizations to quickly adapt to changing circumstances and respond to new challenges.
Collaboration and Communication: Open communication and information sharing are critical for the success of the swarm model.

Key Components:

Shared Purpose: A clear and compelling vision that aligns and motivates everyone in the organization.
Autonomous Teams: Empowered teams that can operate independently and make decisions within their areas of expertise.
Fluid Roles: Individuals are not limited to fixed roles or titles. They can contribute to various tasks and projects based on their skills and interests.
Open Communication: Information flows freely throughout the organization, enabling individuals to make informed decisions and coordinate their actions.
Technology Enablement: Digital tools and platforms facilitate communication, collaboration, and knowledge sharing.

Potential Benefits:

Increased Agility: The swarm structure enables organisations to respond rapidly to change and capitalise on new opportunities.
Enhanced Innovation: By fostering a culture of experimentation and collaboration, swarm organisations can generate more innovative solutions.
Improved Employee Engagement: The emphasis on autonomy and empowerment can lead to increased motivation and job satisfaction.
Greater Resilience: Decentralized decision-making and self-organization create a more resilient system that can withstand disruptions.

Potential Challenges:

Lack of Clarity: The absence of a clear hierarchy can create confusion and ambiguity, especially for those accustomed to traditional structures.
Decision-Making Delays: Collective decision-making can be slower than top-down models, which may be a disadvantage in situations requiring rapid response.
Coordination Challenges: Ensuring effective coordination and alignment between autonomous teams can be challenging.
Culture Shift: Transitioning to a swarm structure requires a significant cultural shift, which may face resistance from employees accustomed to traditional hierarchies.

The Swarm Organizational Structure is a radical departure from conventional management models, but it offers a compelling alternative for organisations seeking to thrive in a complex and rapidly changing world.

Development of an Intentional Society

Many individuals and groups are striving for a better society. A common theme is to disable and replace in total or in part. Despite the harmful effects of some components of our current society, disabling them can have increasingly harmful consequences. Our society, overall, functions. We have health support in place by governments, supply infrastructure, information-sharing networks, and supported research and development. To disable this in a timeframe faster than society can adapt and systems can be replaced will likely have harmful consequences such as chaos and loss of the minimal well-being we currently have.

The timeline is another common theme. Many well-being activists are motivated by the prospect of seeing the outcome of their efforts within their lifetime. This is reasonable for small or local changes, however, to affect global changes in a short period does not give society time to adapt. Many dysfunctional practices are well internalised into the various cultures and passed on to future generations. These will take generational timeframes to change. Another issue with short timeframes is the high probability of loss of resources and power to those who currently control them. Not all in power will do the right thing and support a change that leaves them with substantial losses. It is more likely they will mount a resistance that could destroy or inhibit any efforts of change that work against them.

The Multi-generational Timeline

The multi-generational timeline gives time for society to adapt and for those in power who may otherwise resist, to see their lives out without creating resistance.

Although this may reduce the motivation for those who wish to affect change, being unable to see the ultimate results in their lifetimes, the growth of a new society can occur significantly and visibly in a person’s lifetime by allowing them to be a part of the development of and immersion into local versions a new society now.

From Intentional Communities to Intentional Society

Many facets of an imagined future society can exist today. These can be explored today by creating intentional communities living under evolving conditions based on the principles of the project.

Knowledge can be shared and people can move between communities to connect and network.

Intentional communities do not need to be large. Any place where people can live together or live close enough together to jointly experience and explore the envisioned society could be viable. This may be as few as 2 people or nearby individuals.

Structure Posts

Model Agreements for Sharing Space

Sep 6, 2024 | Structure

These can be a basis for space-sharing agreements when two or more people share space for some time in the context of the program. When decisions need to be made in regard to agreement details, they can be guided by the principles of the project, which broadly are:...

globalwellbeingproject@gmail.com

facebook.com/GlobalWellbeingProject/